October 16, 2014
by PharmaReviews
0 comments
October 9, 2014
by PharmaReviews
1 Comment

October 5, 2014
by PharmaReviews
0 comments
Oxidized LDL might actually be ‘good guy’
A team of investigators at the University of Kentucky has made a thought-provoking discovery about a type of cholesterol previously believed to be a “bad guy” in the development of heart disease and other conditions. Jason Meyer, a University of Kentucky MD-PhD candidate, worked with Deneys van der Westhuyzen, Ph.D., a Professor in the Departments of Internal Medicine and Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, to study the role oxidized LDL plays in the development of plaque inside artery walls.
According to Meyer, the medical research community has traditionally believed that oxidized LDL plays a pivotal role in that process.
“Oxidized LDL moves rapidly into arterial walls and engorges them with cholesterol,” explains Meyer. “Cholesterol ultimately converts into plaque, blocking the arteries or, in a worst case scenario, rupturing and sending clots into the bloodstream, causing heart attacks and/or strokes.”
However, more recent studies in animals and humans have brought that assumption into question, and the oxidized LDL theory is currently the subject of lively debate.
“Though in its very early stages, our research will add considerably to that controversy,” Meyer says, “because it seems to indicate that oxidized LDL might in fact be a ‘good guy’ in the process.”
The team’s findings come from a project studying a pathway of cholesterol transport called “selective lipid uptake.”
“Based on our analysis, we were surprised to find that, instead of increasing the amount of cholesterol uptake and accumulation in the macrophage foam cells, mildly oxidized LDL almost completely prevents increases in cholesterol,” Dr. van der Westhuyzen said.
Meyer says the implications of the study are potentially profound.
“If it is demonstrated that oxidized LDL actually has a preventive effect on the accumulation of cholesterol in arterial walls, it may be possible to create a medicine from oxidized LDL to help prevent or treat this killer disease,” Meyer said. “There is still much work to do because this project is very early in development and has not been tested in animals, but the results we have so far are very promising.”
Meyer and van der Westhuyzen’s findings were published in the August issue of the Journal of Lipid Research
October 5, 2014
by PharmaReviews
0 comments
Transplant drug could boost the power of brain tumor treatments
Every day, organ transplant patients around the world take a drug called rapamycin to keep their immune systems from rejecting their new kidneys and hearts. New research suggests that the same drug could help brain tumor patients by boosting the effect of new immune-based therapies.
In experiments in animals, researchers from the University of Michigan Medical School showed that adding rapamycin to an immunotherapy approach strengthened the immune response against brain tumor cells.
What’s more, the drug also increased the immune system’s “memory” cells so that they could attack the tumor if it ever reared its head again. The mice and rats in the study that received rapamycin lived longer than those that didn’t.
Now, the U-M team plans to add rapamycin to clinical gene therapy and immunotherapy trials to improve the treatment of brain tumors. They currently have a trial under way at the U-M Health System which tests a two-part gene therapy approach in patients with brain tumors called gliomas in an effort to get the immune system to attack the tumor. In future clinical trials, adding rapamycin could increase the therapeutic response.
The new findings, published online in the journal Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, show that combining rapamycin with a gene therapy approach enhanced the animals’ ability to summon immune cells called CD8+ T cells to kill tumor cells directly. Due to this cytotoxic effect, the tumors shrank and the animals lived longer.
But the addition of rapamycin to immunotherapy even for a short while also allowed the rodents to develop tumor-specific memory CD8+ T cells that remember the specific “signature” of the glioma tumor cells and attacked them swiftly when a tumor was introduced into the brain again.
“We had some indication that rapamycin would enhance the cytotoxic T cell effect, from previous experiments in both animals and humans showing that the drug produced modest effects by itself,” says Maria Castro, Ph.D., senior author of the new paper. Past clinical trials of rapamycin in brain tumors have failed.
“But in combination with immunotherapy, it became a dramatic effect, and enhanced the efficacy of memory T cells too. This highlights the versatility of the immunotherapy approach to glioma.” Castro is the R.C. Schneider Collegiate Professor of neurosurgery and a professor of cell and developmental biology at U-M.
Rapamycin is an FDA-approved drug that produces few side effects in transplant patients and others who take it to modify their immune response. So in the future, Castro and her colleagues plan to propose new clinical trials that will add rapamycin to immune gene therapy trials like those already ongoing at UMHS.
She notes that other researchers currently studying immunotherapies for glioma and other brain tumors should also consider doing the same. “This could be a universal mechanism for enhancing efficacy of immunotherapies in glioma,” she says.
Rapamycin inhibits a specific molecule in cells, called mTOR. As part of the research, Castro and her colleagues determined that brain tumor cells use the mTOR pathway to hamper the immune response of patients.
This allows the tumor to trick the immune system, so it can continue growing without alerting the body’s T cells that a foreign entity is present. Inhibiting mTOR with rapamycin, then, uncloaks the cells and makes them vulnerable to attack.
Castro notes that if the drug proves useful in human patients, it could also be used for long-term prevention of recurrence in patients who have had the bulk of their tumor removed. “This tumor always comes back,” she says.
The paper’s co-first authors are Yohei Mineharu, M.D., Ph.D., and Neha Kamran, Ph.D. Mineharu is a former member of Castro’s team who is now on the faculty at Japan’s Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation; Kamran is a postdoctoral research fellow in Neurosurgery. U-M neurosurgery professor and Castro’s longtime collaborator Pedro Lowenstein, M.D., Ph.D. is a co-author, and leads the current clinical trial.
The research was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke (NS052465, NS074387, NS057711, NS054193, NS061107, NS082311) as well as by National Institutes of Health training grants TR000433, CA009676 and NS007222; The Phase One Foundation and the U-M Department of Neurosurgery.
October 5, 2014
by PharmaReviews
1 Comment
New research outlines promising therapies for small cell lung cancer
Two recently published studies by a research team at University Hospitals (UH) Case Medical Center Seidman Cancer Center have the potential to advance treatments for small cell lung cell cancer (SCLC). This aggressive form of lung cancer has seen no treatment advances in 30 years and “is a disease in urgent need of new drug therapies,” write the study’s authors.
“In small cell lung cancer, which impacts about 30-40,000 people each year in the United States, there has been no therapeutic progress and very little research,” says Afshin Dowlati, MD, lead author and Director of the Center for Cancer Drug Development at UH Seidman Cancer Center. “Additionally, there are no approved targeted therapies for the disease. These studies lay the foundation for future research aimed at finding important new treatments for this highly malignant cancer.”
A study titled, RET Mutation and Expression in Small Cell Lung Cancer, was published in the September issue of Journal of Thoracic Oncology and found a new mutation in SCLC which may play a role in the disease’s development. The researchers found that the genetic mutation, called RET (rearranged during transfection), was linked to rapid cell growth.
The research team examined specimens in its database of metastatic SCLC tumors, one of the largest databases of its kind in the country. They found that the RET mutant protein was potentially linked to faster-growing cells that were sensitive to ponatinib and vandetanib, two new targeted drug therapies. Future clinical trials for patients with the RET mutation are planned to further validate the data.
“We were encouraged to find that these two cancer-fighting therapies are potentially effective at stopping cancer cell growth in certain small cell lung cancers,” says Dr. Dowlati, who is Professor of Medicine – Hematology/Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and a member of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. “These findings have the potential to give cancer physicians a new tool to more effectively tailor treatments for patients.”
The other study, published in PLOS One, outlines a novel approach to identify new drug therapies for SCLC based on tumors’ genomic profiles. The research team discovered new molecular targets for treating the disease by extracting data from SCLC tumors to examine drug sensitivity. Through this analysis, they outlined a promising new approach to predict which cancer-fighting drugs would be the most broadly effective at slowing tumor growth.
“This study enabled us to identify which drugs may be the most useful in which types of tumors,” says Dr. Dowlati. “Small cell lung cancer is one of the fastest growing cancers and these studies have yielded small but important therapeutic insights into this disease.” Dr. Dowlati is additionally the Rosalie and Morton A. Cohen Chair in Oncology and the Lucile and Robert H. Gries Endowed Director, Center for Cancer Drug Development at UH Seidman Cancer Center.
Both studies were funded by the UH Seidman Cancer Center, part of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center at Case Western Reserve.
October 5, 2014
by PharmaReviews
0 comments
Pfizer and Kyowa Hakko Kirin to collaborate on immuno-oncology combination study
Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) and Kyowa Hakko Kirin (Tokyo:4151), have entered into an agreement to explore the therapeutic potential of the combination of Pfizer’s PF-05082566, an investigational, fully humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) that stimulates signaling through 4-1BB (CD-137), a protein involved in regulation of immune cell activation, proliferation and survival, with Kyowa Hakko Kirin’s anti-CCR4 antibody mogamulizumab, which suppresses some of the immune cells that shield the tumor from the immune system, in a Phase Ib clinical study evaluating the safety and tolerability of the combination in patients with solid tumors.
Under the terms of the agreement, Pfizer and Kyowa Hakko Kirin will co-fund the clinical study, which will be conducted by Pfizer. This study is expected to establish a recommended dose regimen and assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination. This study is expected to begin in 2015 and the results will determine the future clinical development of the combination.
“We believe that combination therapy in immuno-oncology holds great promise to improve outcomes for patients with cancer and provides an exciting opportunity for Pfizer to maximize the potential of our emerging immuno-oncology portfolio,” said Dr. Mace Rothenberg, senior vice president of Clinical Development and Medical Affairs and chief medical officer for Pfizer Oncology. “Our collaboration with Kyowa Hakko Kirin provides an additional important partnership opportunity to explore the potential of 4-1BB as part of a novel immunotherapy combination regimen.”
“With recent progress in the field of cancer immunotherapy, the combination therapy of mogamulizumab and Pfizer’s 4-1BB agonist has the potential to bring significant benefits to patients,” said Yoichi Sato, managing executive officer, vice president, Head of Research and Development Division of Kyowa Hakko Kirin. “Collaborating with Pfizer, a world’s leading pharmaceutical company, on a clinical study in emerging immuno-oncology field is an important component of Kyowa Hakko Kirin’s ongoing transformation into a global specialty pharmaceutical company. We are excited about this opportunity.”
About PF-05082566
PF-05082566 is an investigational, fully humanized mAb that targets 4-1BB (CD-137), a protein expressed in many immune cells. In pre-clinical models, it has shown anti-tumor activity by enhancing T-cell mediated immune responses. Pfizer is currently evaluating PF-05082566 in a Phase I study as a single agent in multiple tumor types, as well as in several combination studies, including a clinical study of PF-05082566 in combination with rituximab in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. PF-05082566 is not approved for any indications in any markets.
About Mogamulizumab
Mogamulizumab is a novel, humanized mAb directed against CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4). Engineered by Kyowa Hakko Kirin’s unique POTELLIGENT® Technology, the antibody is designed to kill its target cells through potent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Mogamulizumab was launched in Japan in May 2012 for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CCR4-positive adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL). The drug was approved for indication expansion and was granted marketing authorization in Japan for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CCR4-positive, peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in March 2014. Clinical trials with mogamulizumab in ATL, PTCL, and CTCL are ongoing in the US, EU and other countries.
About Pfizer Oncology
Pfizer Oncology is committed to the discovery, investigation and development of innovative treatment options to improve the outlook for cancer patients worldwide. Our strong pipeline of biologics and small molecules, one of the most robust in the industry, is studied with precise focus on identifying and translating the best scientific breakthroughs into clinical application for patients across a wide range of cancers. By working collaboratively with academic institutions, individual researchers, cooperative research groups, governments, and licensing partners, Pfizer Oncology strives to cure or control cancer with breakthrough medicines, to deliver the right drug for each patient at the right time.
Pfizer Inc.: Working together for a healthier world®
At Pfizer, we apply science and our global resources to bring therapies to people that extend and significantly improve their lives. We strive to set the standard for quality, safety and value in the discovery, development and manufacture of health care products. Our global portfolio includes medicines and vaccines as well as many of the world’s best-known consumer health care products. Every day, Pfizer colleagues work across developed and emerging markets to advance wellness, prevention, treatments and cures that challenge the most feared diseases of our time. Consistent with our responsibility as one of the world’s premier innovative biopharmaceutical companies, we collaborate with health care providers, governments and local communities to support and expand access to reliable, affordable health care around the world. For more than 150 years, Pfizer has worked to make a difference for all who rely on us.
About Kyowa Hakko Kirin
Kyowa Hakko Kirin is a leading biopharmaceutical company in Japan focusing on its core business area of oncology, nephrology and immunology/allergy. Kyowa Hakko Kirin leverages antibody-related leading-edge technologies to discover and develop innovative new drugs aiming to become a global specialty pharmaceutical company which contributes to the health and well-being of people around the world.
October 5, 2014
by PharmaReviews
0 comments
Bayer closes acquisition of consumer care business of Merck & Co., Inc., United States, for USD 14.2 billion
Bayer has completed the acquisition of the consumer care business of the U.S. pharmaceuticals group Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey. The transaction closed on October 1, 2014, following receipt of required antitrust approvals. “This acquisition is a milestone for Bayer and we intend to continue the expansion of our attractive over-the-counter business both through organic growth and bolt-on acquisitions,” explained Bayer CEO Dr. Marijn Dekkers. Bayer paid a purchase price of USD 14.2 billion, less certain contingent amounts held back that will be payable upon antitrust approvals in Mexico and the Republic of Korea. Integration of the acquired business has been successfully initiated. The combined consumer care business is headed by Erica Mann, member of the Bayer HealthCare Executive Committee and responsible for the Consumer Care division.
The acquisition significantly enhances Bayer’s over-the-counter (OTC) business across multiple therapeutic categories and geographies. Pro forma sales of the combined businesses in 2013 amounted to USD 7.4 billion (EUR 5.5 billion), with Merck & Co., Inc.’s business contributing approximately USD 2.2 billion. The acquisition will give Bayer the global number two position in non-prescription medication – behind the combined OTC businesses of Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline, following the completion of their announced joint venture in 2015, and ahead of the world’s previous industry leader Johnson & Johnson.
Within a highly diverse industry, Bayer is now the OTC leader in North and Latin America and the leader in dermatology and gastrointestinal treatments, two of the five most important non-prescription health care product categories. The company has advanced to the number two position in the cold, allergy, sinus and flu category and remains the number two in nutritionals and number three in analgesics.
The consumer care business acquired from Merck & Co., Inc. is primarily comprised of products in the cold, allergy, sinus & flu; dermatology (including sun care); foot health; and gastrointestinal categories. The most important brands are Claritin™ (allergy), Coppertone™ (sun care), MiraLAX™ (gastrointestinals), Afrin™ (cold) and – in North and Latin America – Dr. Scholl’s™ (foot care). These brands complement Bayer’s existing OTC portfolio, which includes brands such as Aspirin™ and Aleve™ in the analgesics category, dermatology products including Canesten™ and Bepanthen™/Bepanthol™, nutritional brands such as Supradyn™, One A Day™, Berocca™, Elevit™ and Redoxon™, antacids such as Rennie™ and Talcid™, and cough-and-cold products such as Alka-Seltzer Plus™ and White & Black™.
The purchase price of USD 14.2 billion includes a payment associated with sales of Claritin™ and Afrin™ in certain countries where these products are still prescription-only.
Bayer also expects the integration of the businesses to generate significant cost synergies – particularly in marketing spend and cost of goods – in the neighborhood of USD 200 million per year by 2017. Revenue synergies from increased commercial presence and leveraging Bayer’s substantial global infrastructure in key growth regions to roll out the Merck brands ex-US are expected to amount to approximately USD 400 million by 2017. Bayer anticipates one-time costs of approximately USD 0.5 billion for executing the transaction and combining the businesses, primarily in 2014/2015. The acquisition is expected to yield a positive contribution of 2 percent to core earnings per share already in the first year after closing.
The acquisition has been financed with a bridge facility, with part of this loan already redeemed using two hybrid bonds amounting to EUR 3.25 billion. Bayer plans to issue additional bonds for further financing on the capital market.
Approximately 2,000 employees from Merck & Co., Inc. and 8,800 from Bayer will be brought together under one roof in Bayer’s new consumer care business. The integration process is off to a successful start with the decision on appointments to the top two management levels. The third management level is expected to be completed in the autumn of 2014. “Our goal is to combine the best people and capabilities of both organizations”, said Erica Mann. The management team of the merged businesses will be located at existing Bayer sites in Whippany, New Jersey, United States; Basel, Switzerland; Shanghai, China; Leverkusen, Germany; and Singapore.
The strategic pharma collaboration between Bayer and Merck & Co., Inc. in the field of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) modulators also comes into effect simultaneously. Bayer plans to strengthen its development options in the cardiology business with the global co-development and co-commercialization agreement, which has already been approved by the relevant antitrust authorities. Merck & Co., Inc. will make payments of up to USD 2.1 billion to Bayer. These include an up-front payment of USD 1 billion, which is to be paid shortly after completion as well as revenue-based milestone payments of up to USD 1.1 billion for future combined sales of certain jointly developed substances, including the pulmonary hypertension treatment Adempas™ (riociguat).
Bayer: Science For A Better Life
Bayer is a global enterprise with core competencies in the fields of health care, agriculture and high-tech polymer materials. As an innovation company, it sets trends in research-intensive areas. Bayer’s products and services are designed to benefit people and improve their quality of life. At the same time, the Group aims to create value through innovation, growth and high earning power. Bayer is committed to the principles of sustainable development and to its social and ethical responsibilities as a corporate citizen. In fiscal 2013, Bayer employed some 113,200 people and had sales of EUR 40.2 billion. Capital expenditures amounted to EUR 2.2 billion, R&D expenses to EUR 3.2 billion.
October 5, 2014
by PharmaReviews
0 comments
New drug-delivery capsule may replace injections
Given a choice, most patients would prefer to take a drug orally instead of getting an injection. Unfortunately, many drugs, especially those made from large proteins, cannot be given as a pill because they get broken down in the stomach before they can be absorbed. To help overcome that obstacle, researchers at MIT and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) have devised a novel drug capsule coated with tiny needles that can inject drugs directly into the lining of the stomach after the capsule is swallowed. In animal studies, the team found that the capsule delivered insulin more efficiently than injection under the skin, and there were no harmful side effects as the capsule passed through the digestive system.
“This could be a way that the patient can circumvent the need to have an infusion or subcutaneous administration of a drug,” says Giovanni Traverso, a research fellow at MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, a gastroenterologist at MGH, and one of the lead authors of the paper, which appears in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Although the researchers tested their capsule with insulin, they anticipate that it would be most useful for delivering biopharmaceuticals such as antibodies, which are used to treat cancer and autoimmune disorders like arthritis and Crohn’s disease. This class of drugs, known as “biologics,” also includes vaccines, recombinant DNA, and RNA.
“The large size of these biologic drugs makes them nonabsorbable. And before they even would be absorbed, they’re degraded in your GI tract by acids and enzymes that just eat up the molecules and make them inactive,” says Carl Schoellhammer, a graduate student in chemical engineering and a lead author of the paper.
Safe and effective delivery
Scientists have tried designing microparticles and nanoparticles that can deliver biologics, but such particles are expensive to produce and require a new version to be engineered for each drug.
Schoellhammer, Traverso, and their colleagues set out to design a capsule that would serve as a platform for the delivery of a wide range of therapeutics, prevent degradation of the drugs, and inject the payload directly into the lining of the GI tract. Their prototype acrylic capsule, 2 centimeters long and 1 centimeter in diameter, includes a reservoir for the drug and is coated with hollow, stainless steel needles about 5 millimeters long.
Previous studies of accidental ingestion of sharp objects in human patients have suggested that it could be safe to swallow a capsule coated with short needles. Because there are no pain receptors in the GI tract, patients would not feel any pain from the drug injection.
To test whether this type of capsule could allow safe and effective drug delivery, the researchers tested it in pigs, with insulin as the drug payload. It took more than a week for the capsules to move through the entire digestive tract, and the researchers found no traces of tissue damage, supporting the potential safety of this novel approach.
They also found that the microneedles successfully injected insulin into the lining of the stomach, small intestine, and colon, causing the animals’ blood glucose levels to drop. This reduction in blood glucose was faster and larger than the drop seen when the same amount of glucose was given by subcutaneous injection.
“The kinetics are much better, and much faster-onset, than those seen with traditional under-the-skin administration,” Traverso says. “For molecules that are particularly difficult to absorb, this would be a way of actually administering them at much higher efficiency.”
“This is a very interesting approach,” says Samir Mitragotri, a professor of chemical engineering at the University of California at Santa Barbara who was not involved in the research. “Oral delivery of drugs is a major challenge, especially for protein drugs. There is tremendous motivation on various fronts for finding other ways to deliver drugs without using the standard needle and syringe.”
Further optimization
This approach could also be used to administer vaccines that normally have to be injected, the researchers say.
The team now plans to modify the capsule so that peristalsis, or contractions of the digestive tract, would slowly squeeze the drug out of the capsule as it travels through the tract. They are also working on capsules with needles made of degradable polymers and sugar that would break off and become embedded in the gut lining, where they would slowly disintegrate and release the drug. This would further minimize any safety concern.
Avi Schroeder, a former Koch Institute postdoc, is also a lead author of the paper. The senior authors are Robert Langer, the David H. Koch Institute Professor at MIT and a member of the Koch Institute, the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science (IMES), and the Department of Chemical Engineering; Daniel Blankschtein, the Herman P. Meissner Professor of Chemical Engineering; and Daniel Anderson, the Samuel A. Goldblith Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering and a member of the Koch Institute and IMES.
The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
October 5, 2014
by PharmaReviews
0 comments
Common painkillers combined with other drugs may cause high risk of GI bleeding
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) – such as ibuprofen and aspirin – increase one’s risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. When taken in combination with other drugs, this risk is significantly higher, according to new research appearing in the October issue of Gastroenterology, the official journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.
“These findings may help clinicians tailor therapy to minimize upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and are especially valuable in elderly patients who are likely to use multiple drugs at the same time,” said Gwen Masclee, MD, lead study author from Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. “Defining risk factors is a critical step towards improving care and decreasing NSAID-associated complications and deaths.”
Researchers performed a self-controlled case series analysis of data from 114,835 patients with upper GI bleeding. Drug exposure was determined based on prescriptions of NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors – such as Bextra®, Celebrex® and Vioxx® – or low-dose aspirin, alone and in combination with other drugs that affect risk for internal bleeding. This study identified that:
- Single therapy with non-selective NSAIDs (the commonly found NSAIDs, which contain both COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes) is more likely to cause upper GI bleeding than single therapy with COX-2 inhibitors or low-dose aspirin.
- Combination therapy significantly increases the risk for internal bleeding, with simultaneous use of non-selective NSAIDs and steroid therapies increasing the risk to the greatest extent.
- The risk of upper GI bleeding is always higher for drug combinations with non-selective NSAIDs than that for low-dose aspirin or COX-2 inhibitors.
- Simultaneous use of non-selective NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin, but not COX-2 inhibitors, with corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists (diuretic drugs) or anticoagulants (which prevent the blood from clotting) produces significant excess risk of upper GI bleeding.
In patients with increased risk, the researchers recommend first reassessing the need for NSAID therapy (or for the concomitant medication). If feasible, discontinuation of NSAIDs is the preferred strategy in high-risk patients. When NSAIDs are necessary, they should be used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible duration.
“Importantly, we found that risk varies dramatically from patient to patient based on underlying characteristics, necessitating careful review to assess risk in each individual using NSAIDs,” added Dr. Masclee.
NSAIDs act as pain relievers and fever reducers. Prescription NSAIDs can also work to reduce inflammation. There are currently more than 500 over-the-counter and prescription NSAIDs, including ibuprofen (Advil®, Motrin IB®), naproxen sodium (Aleve®) and aspirin (Bayer®).
October 4, 2014
by PharmaReviews
0 comments



